Skip to content

INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE

Screen printing data for AI registration and proof review

Screen printing involves a design, screen setup and printed result that can be compared through visible registration.

By Fiund · Updated 2026-11-05

NAICS 323113 · Commercial Screen Printing

Screen printing involves a design, screen setup and printed result that can be compared through visible registration. Ryonet's process guide provides first-party production context. An original inspection sample can define the acceptable alignment in its own fictional work instruction. Ryonet screen-printing guide

Create a two-color geometric design owned by the contributor, a mock approved proof and photographs of paper prints. Offset one color in a controlled demonstration and include another sample with a deliberate design gap. Ask the assistant to identify the discrepancy supported by the proof. A second proof revision should move a design element, making the old reference unsuitable for that print.

Annotate color layer, registration reference, proof revision and observed location. Hold out a new shape arrangement during evaluation. Score confusing intended negative space with misregistration separately from missing an actual offset. The key should keep visible print differences distinct from speculation about the machine setting that caused them.

Use original artwork and inert demonstration materials. Customer trademarks, licensed illustrations and production-screen exports need permission. Describe the visual comparison task and independently checked examples to prospective buyers. Confirm the required image quality, reference pairing and scope before commissioning additional capture or preparing a commercial print archive.

Discuss this original manufacturing sample with Fiund

Original Fiund exercise

A deliberate overlap versus a displaced second color

A contributor makes an original two-color geometric proof. Image coordinates use the printed ruler and left reference cross.

Fictional records supplied to the evaluator
RecordSourceWhat it records
R1Mock proofRed and blue overlap intentionally by 2 mm. Both reference crosses share x=0.
R2Printed sampleRed cross x=0; blue cross x=1 mm. Shapes overlap by 1 mm.
R3Inspection noteBlue moves right in the image frame; the ruler is legible.
R4ScopeNo production tolerance provided.

Question for the model

How should the reviewer label the overlap and registration?

Show the reference answer and checks

The 2 mm overlap in R1 is intentional. R2–R3 show the blue reference displaced 1 mm to the right while red stays at zero, with a 1 mm observed overlap. Document the registration discrepancy against the proof; R4 precludes a pass/fail grade.

  • Calling every overlap a misprint
  • Reporting the observed overlap as the offset without using reference crosses

Fields to preserve

color_pass
Identifies each independently positioned layer
cross_offset
Compares alignment against the proof reference
intended_overlap
Distinguishes design from displacement

Test another case

Shift both reference crosses equally relative to the paper edge and keep them aligned to each other; separate whole-print placement from inter-color registration.

Use owned imagery and paper samples only; no customer logos or industrial settings.

Download this fictional example and answer key (JSON)

Discuss a contribution

Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.

Primary sources and further reading