INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE
Psychiatry consultation note and encounter evidence for AI
A psychiatric practice can demonstrate how a reviewer distinguishes a consultation request, a signed note and a later administrative acknowledgment.
NAICS 621112 · Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists
A psychiatric practice can demonstrate how a reviewer distinguishes a consultation request, a signed note and a later administrative acknowledgment. MentalHealthBench shows how experts score responses to synthetic mental health conversations. A practice can apply the idea to documentation and uncertainty with original mock records. OpenAI MentalHealthBench
Create two fictional encounters with the same date and distinct visit identifiers. Attach a signed consult note to one and a scheduling update to the other. Ask the model which encounter has a completed note and who authored it. Include an unsigned addendum and require the answer to keep its status visible.
Use no actual patients, session narratives, medication details, clinician recordings or case histories. Keep diagnosis, treatment, triage and clinical interpretation outside the exercise.
Describe a fictional psychiatric documentation sample
Original Fiund exercise
A signed consultation note differs from a scheduling update and unsigned addendum
An original documentation exercise uses two invented encounters on the same day. It includes no consultation narrative, diagnosis, medication, patient or clinician recording.
| Record | Source | What it records |
|---|---|---|
| PN1 | Encounter E1 | Signed mock consult cover N1 names E1, author role R-A, day 4. Body contains only administrative placeholder text. |
| PN2 | Encounter E2 | Day 4 scheduling update names E2, author role R-B. No consult note or completion statement supplied. |
| PN3 | Addendum draft | Unsigned N1-A references E1/N1 and proposes an administrative label change. No signature or supersession authority. |
Question for the model
Which encounter has a signed consult note, who authored that record, and does the addendum or E2 update change its status?
Show the reference answer and checks
PN1 documents a signed N1 cover for E1 authored by role R-A. PN2 supports only E2's scheduling update, despite the shared date. PN3 is an unsigned E1 addendum draft and does not replace N1's signed administrative record. Report note authorship, encounter and signature state separately without interpreting clinical content or treating every dated office document as a completed consultation.
- Matching notes solely by date across distinct encounters.
- Treating a scheduling update or unsigned addendum as a signed consultation record.
Fields to preserve
- Encounter and document type
- Separates visits and administrative records.
- Author role and signature state
- Supports authorship and completion.
- Addendum parent and replacement authority
- Preserves version lineage.
Test another case
Sign the addendum but state that it adds a label rather than replaces N1. Require both records to retain their distinct roles.
Use original administrative placeholders. Exclude actual session narratives, histories and medication information; diagnosis, triage and treatment remain outside the evaluation.
Discuss a contribution
Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.