INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE
Specialty rehabilitation hospital assessment records for AI
A specialty hospital can test whether software compares assessments from the same episode and measurement basis.
NAICS 622310 · Specialty (except Psychiatric and Substance Abuse) Hospitals
A specialty hospital can test whether software compares assessments from the same episode and measurement basis. CMS publishes inpatient rehabilitation assessment and reporting materials. A fictional exercise can test provenance while leaving actual functional evaluations private. CMS inpatient rehabilitation reporting resources
Invent an episode and create two harmless task counts at different times. Give them different assistance categories and include one unassigned worksheet. Ask which records belong to the episode and what comparisons the evidence supports. Score task, time and stated conditions independently.
Use abstract identifiers and original measures. Keep real inpatient records, mobility videos, outcome scores and clinical recommendations outside the dataset. Have rehabilitation staff review the fictional scoring design.
Describe a synthetic rehabilitation assessment sample
Original Fiund exercise
Task counts under different assistance conditions are not an unqualified improvement score
A fictional episode contains original tabletop sorting counts with abstract assistance labels. It includes no inpatient, mobility video, clinical score or functional-assessment claim.
| Record | Source | What it records |
|---|---|---|
| RA1 | Episode E, task T | Day 1: 4 inert objects sorted in 60 seconds, condition INDEPENDENT under the original exercise definition. |
| RA2 | Episode E follow-up | Day 3: 6 objects in 60 seconds, condition PROMPTED. Same task label but helper cue allowed. |
| RA3 | Loose worksheet | 8 objects in 60 seconds, condition INDEPENDENT, no episode or date. No reviewed E linkage. |
Question for the model
Which records belong to E, and can their counts alone demonstrate improvement under an unchanged condition?
Show the reference answer and checks
RA1 and RA2 explicitly belong to E and share task T and a 60-second window, but their assistance conditions differ. Report four independent objects and six prompted objects rather than an unqualified two-object improvement under the same conditions. RA3 lacks episode and date, so it cannot supply a matched independent follow-up. The fixture supports provenance and condition checking, not a clinical outcome or rehabilitation judgment.
- Comparing counts while omitting a changed assistance condition.
- Assigning an unlinked worksheet to the episode because it completes the desired comparison.
Fields to preserve
- Episode, task and date
- Defines the observation.
- Count, time window and assistance
- Preserves the measurement basis.
- Worksheet link and comparison limit
- Identifies what is missing.
Test another case
Add a reviewed day-4 independent E/T count in 90 seconds. Require the time-window difference to remain explicit before comparing rates or outcomes.
Use original abstract measures and inert props. Exclude inpatient records and actual outcome scores; rehabilitation staff review the fictional rubric.
Discuss a contribution
Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.