Skip to content

INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE

Recovery residence orientation and acknowledgment data for AI

An orientation packet can be delivered while acknowledgment of a revised version remains pending.

By Fiund · Updated 2026-11-05

NAICS 623220 · Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities

An orientation packet can be delivered while acknowledgment of a revised version remains pending. Massachusetts publishes descriptions of residential substance use treatment and recovery services. An original mock workflow can test how software matches versions without learning anything about an actual resident. Massachusetts residential service descriptions

Create fictional packet versions V1 and V2. Change an optional orientation session and supply a V1 receipt and a V2 dispatch with no reply. Ask which material was acknowledged and what evidence still needs review. Score version and delivery state independently.

Keep residents, site details, attendance, treatment histories and records out. Use your own forms and an invented program. Any later real data request requires a separate privacy review.

Describe a fictional orientation records sample

Original Fiund exercise

Receipt of orientation version 1 does not acknowledge version 2

An invented program uses independently written orientation-cover cards. It includes no resident, site, attendance, treatment history or actual service record.

Fictional records supplied to the evaluator
RecordSourceWhat it records
OA1Packet V1Original optional adult orientation session listed day 6. Mock receipt explicitly acknowledges program P/V1 on day 2.
OA2Packet V2Approved revision changes that optional session to day 8. V2 dispatched day 4 with explicit P/V2 reference.
OA3Reply stateNo V2 acknowledgment supplied. Generic inbox note says 'packet received' but gives no program, recipient or version.

Question for the model

Which packet version has a matched acknowledgment, and what does V2's dispatch establish about its receipt?

Show the reference answer and checks

OA1 explicitly acknowledges P/V1. OA2 establishes approval and dispatch of P/V2, not its acknowledgment. OA3's generic note lacks the version and program references needed to close that gap. Preserve V1's receipt and V2's sent state separately rather than transfer an earlier acknowledgment to revised material. The optional-session change supplies no attendance or treatment information and the fixture concerns document workflow only.

  • Treating an earlier version's receipt as acknowledgment of a revised packet.
  • Matching a generic inbox note without program or version identity.

Fields to preserve

Program and packet version
Defines the document.
Changed session and approval
Limits the revision.
Dispatch and exact acknowledgment target
Separates delivery states.

Test another case

Add a V2 acknowledgment from another program P2. Require P's receipt gap to remain despite the matching version label.

Use original invented program records. Exclude residents, locations and histories; any later real-data use requires a separate privacy review.

Download this fictional example and answer key (JSON)

Discuss a contribution

Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.

Primary sources and further reading