INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE
Floating drydock repair records for AI handoff review
A work order can mark a repair task complete while a follow-up inspection remains open.
NAICS 488390 · Other Support Activities for Water Transportation
A work order can mark a repair task complete while a follow-up inspection remains open. Census lists routine repair and maintenance in floating drydocks under water transportation support, and OSHA publishes maritime guidance. A drydock operator can illustrate how a qualified reviewer links tasks, images, and follow-up records without exposing vessel designs. Census NAICS manual · OSHA maritime guidance
Invent two repair locations on a generic panel and a scope revision changing one task. Add a completion record with a matching image and another with an image tied to the prior revision. Ask which work packet can be closed and which needs an authorized inspection. Keep repair status separate from vessel release in the expected answer.
Use no real vessel details, photographs of restricted sites, client drawings, operating procedures, or live activity. A bench mock-up and synthetic checklist are sufficient for the first conversation.
Describe a drydock records exercise
Original Fiund exercise
A revised work scope needs matching evidence and its own follow-up inspection
A generic bench panel has two original task locations. It includes no vessel, repair technique, client drawing, site photograph or operating procedure.
| Record | Source | What it records |
|---|---|---|
| DR1 | Scope versions | Task A at panel LEFT unchanged. Task B at RIGHT changes from scope v1 to v2 with a different review criterion; original criterion text is abstract. |
| DR2 | Task A packet | Authorized completion, matching A/LEFT image annotation and signed follow-up inspection all supplied. |
| DR3 | Task B packet | Completion card names B/v2, but image annotation explicitly names B/v1. Follow-up inspection field blank; no correction supplied. |
Question for the model
Which work packet has aligned completion and follow-up evidence, and what prevents B's packet from closing under the stated document check?
Show the reference answer and checks
DR2 aligns A's scope location, completion, image and signed follow-up inspection. DR3 conflicts between B's v2 completion card and v1 image, and also lacks follow-up inspection. These are separate evidence gaps; the completion label alone cannot establish the current criterion was reviewed. Flag both for an authorized reviewer without making a repair-adequacy or vessel-release determination from a fictional panel task.
- Using prior-revision imagery to support changed-scope completion.
- Treating a task-complete card as a follow-up inspection or vessel release.
Fields to preserve
- Panel location, task and scope version
- Defines the work.
- Completion/image revision match
- Supports evidence alignment.
- Inspection authority and missingness
- Limits closeout.
Test another case
Add B/v2 imagery but no follow-up signature. Require the revision gap to close while inspection remains open.
Use owned mockups and original records. Exclude vessel designs and restricted sites; qualified staff retain inspection and release decisions.
Discuss a contribution
Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.