{
  "title": "Floating drydock repair records for AI handoff review",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/floating-drydock-repair-evidence-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A revised work scope needs matching evidence and its own follow-up inspection",
    "context": "A generic bench panel has two original task locations. It includes no vessel, repair technique, client drawing, site photograph or operating procedure.",
    "records": [
      [
        "DR1",
        "Scope versions",
        "Task A at panel LEFT unchanged. Task B at RIGHT changes from scope v1 to v2 with a different review criterion; original criterion text is abstract."
      ],
      [
        "DR2",
        "Task A packet",
        "Authorized completion, matching A/LEFT image annotation and signed follow-up inspection all supplied."
      ],
      [
        "DR3",
        "Task B packet",
        "Completion card names B/v2, but image annotation explicitly names B/v1. Follow-up inspection field blank; no correction supplied."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which work packet has aligned completion and follow-up evidence, and what prevents B's packet from closing under the stated document check?",
    "answer": "DR2 aligns A's scope location, completion, image and signed follow-up inspection. DR3 conflicts between B's v2 completion card and v1 image, and also lacks follow-up inspection. These are separate evidence gaps; the completion label alone cannot establish the current criterion was reviewed. Flag both for an authorized reviewer without making a repair-adequacy or vessel-release determination from a fictional panel task.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Using prior-revision imagery to support changed-scope completion.",
      "Treating a task-complete card as a follow-up inspection or vessel release."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Panel location, task and scope version",
        "Defines the work."
      ],
      [
        "Completion/image revision match",
        "Supports evidence alignment."
      ],
      [
        "Inspection authority and missingness",
        "Limits closeout."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Add B/v2 imagery but no follow-up signature. Require the revision gap to close while inspection remains open.",
    "boundary": "Use owned mockups and original records. Exclude vessel designs and restricted sites; qualified staff retain inspection and release decisions."
  }
}