INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE
Metal heat-treatment data for AI lot and stage history
Metal heat treating has a defined Census scope.
NAICS 332811 · Metal Heat Treating
Metal heat treating has a defined Census scope. An original document exercise can connect input pieces, a recorded process event and the specimens named by later reports. Census heat-treatment scope
Write fictional piece identifiers, a job traveler and inspection reports. Split one incoming job across two recorded events, then return the pieces under a shared customer reference. Ask which report belongs to each subgroup. Include an observation made before the selected event and a later report missing its specimen identifier. The key should preserve the stage and identity gaps.
Annotate piece, subgroup, event reference, observation stage, specimen and document version. Hold out a new job-number convention for evaluation. Score a shared customer reference used as subgroup identity, pre-event results assigned to the later stage and an unknown specimen guessed independently. A complete case should explicitly link the subgroup to its report.
Use self-authored tables and invented values with no thermal schedule or process instruction. Customer designs, licensed methods, proprietary production information and outside reports require authority and qualified review. A licensing brief should define the event-lineage task and checked examples. Confirm buyer requirements before preparing an operating archive or new capture.
Discuss this original manufacturing sample with Fiund
Original Fiund exercise
A hold stays attached to its own stage
Invented traveler events use neutral stage names. No actual heat cycles or engineering information appear.
| Record | Source | What it records |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Traveler | Piece P8 stage A finished at 10:00; stage B logged at 14:00. |
| 2 | Review record | A review complete at 11:00, explicitly stage A only. |
| 3 | Later note | Stage B evidence requested; none in packet. |
Question for the model
What stage status can be shown at 15:00?
Show the reference answer and checks
Show A complete under record 2, with B logged under record 1 and its review evidence missing under record 3. A's completed review does not cover a later stage merely because the piece ID is the same. This is a document status only.
- Carrying completed status forward across stages
- Treating a logged stage event as its inspection result
Fields to preserve
- piece_id
- Groups the history
- stage_key
- Binds each review to its stage
- review_effective_time
- Supports as-of status
Test another case
Add a late report entered at 16:00 for stage A; keep the 15:00 snapshot free of that future evidence.
No thermal parameters, materials recommendations, real shop records or release authority.
Discuss a contribution
Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.