Skip to content

INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE

Display advertising face and installation evidence for AI

A display structure can have two faces with different creative and installation dates.

By Fiund · Updated 2026-11-05

NAICS 541850 · Indoor and Outdoor Display Advertising

A display structure can have two faces with different creative and installation dates. FHWA publishes outdoor advertising control information. A display operator can use a tabletop fixture or an authorized model to test evidence for a particular face and schedule. FHWA outdoor advertising resources

Create a mock two-sided display with original graphics. Assign face IDs and a scheduled replacement window. Take an installation image for one side and leave the second image’s viewpoint ambiguous. Ask the model which face can be confirmed and whether the timestamp falls within the scheduled period.

Use original graphics and an authorized location. Keep real site details, public faces, plates, permit records and customer contracts out. The example tests image and document matching.

Describe a display installation evidence sample

Original Fiund exercise

A two-sided display needs face-specific installation evidence

An owned tabletop display has original geometric graphics and dummy face markers. It contains no actual site, permit, client creative or public-space imagery.

Fictional records supplied to the evaluator
RecordSourceWhat it records
DAF1Practice face scheduleFace A switches to graphic G2 during days 4–5. Face B switches to G3 during days 6–7.
DAF2Installation imageReadable face A and G2 labels, capture day 5; reviewer confirms the face assignment.
DAF3Second imageGraphic G3 visible, day 6, but face marker cropped. No source link identifies face B.

Question for the model

Which scheduled face update is visually supported within its window, and can G3's graphic or timestamp alone confirm B?

Show the reference answer and checks

DAF2 supports A/G2 on day 5 within A's days-4–5 window. DAF3 has G3 and a day-6 timestamp consistent with B's schedule, but lacks the face identity needed to verify B's installation. Expected graphic and timing do not replace that missing link. Report A's confirmed narrow observation and B's unresolved face attribution rather than labeling the entire structure updated.

  • Inferring a face from the graphic expected by the schedule.
  • Treating an in-window timestamp as proof of installation identity.

Fields to preserve

Structure and face ID
Makes the observed surface specific.
Creative version and window
Defines the scheduled change.
Image viewpoint and label visibility
Shows whether the face can be verified.

Test another case

Reveal face A in the G3 image. Require a conflict with its scheduled G2 assignment rather than silently relabeling the image as B.

Use original graphics and approved models. Exclude real sites, faces, plates, permits and customer contracts.

Download this fictional example and answer key (JSON)

Discuss a contribution

Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.

Primary sources and further reading