INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE
Charter bus group assignment records for AI review
A charter group can split across two coaches while the booking record still shows the original total.
NAICS 485510 · Charter Bus Industry
A charter group can split across two coaches while the booking record still shows the original total. FMCSA publishes motorcoach passenger safety information. A charter company can demonstrate a separate records exercise about allocation and handoff without copying a passenger roster. FMCSA motorcoach passenger information
Create a fictional group with two subgroup codes and two vehicle assignments. Record the organizer’s revision after the initial split. Give one vehicle a confirmed boarding count and give the other only a planned allocation. Ask the model which counts can be supported and which the coordinator needs to verify. Add another charter on the same date to test matching by booking and group.
Exclude passenger names, real trip locations, driver details, private customer schedules, and safety incident information. The evaluation ends at reconciliation and never clears a vehicle for departure.
Describe a charter group records sample
Original Fiund exercise
A revised coach allocation is separate from its confirmed boarding count
An invented charter uses subgroup codes and artificial counts. It includes no passengers, driver, real destination, private schedule or departure clearance.
| Record | Source | What it records |
|---|---|---|
| CG1 | Booking B plan | Group total 40 practice places, original split subgroup A=20 on coach C1 and B=20 on C2. |
| CG2 | Organizer revision | Approved revision reallocates A=18 to C1 and B=22 to C2; total remains 40. |
| CG3 | Boarding evidence | C1 count explicitly confirms B/A=18. C2 has allocation only, no boarding count. Another booking B2 has a 22 count on the same date, no B link. |
Question for the model
Which boarding count is confirmed for B, and can its total or the B2 record establish that C2 boarded 22?
Show the reference answer and checks
CG2 sets B's revised allocation at 18 and 22, and CG3 independently confirms 18 boarded for subgroup A on C1. C2's 22 remains a planned allocation without boarding evidence. B2's equal count belongs to another booking and cannot fill it. Preserve the organizer's current plan and the separately observed counts rather than assume a balancing total establishes every vehicle's boarding or clears a coach for departure.
- Treating revised allocation as verified boarding.
- Using another booking's same-date count to force the original total to balance.
Fields to preserve
- Booking, subgroup and coach alias
- Defines the allocation.
- Revision and planned count
- Preserves the approved split.
- Boarding source and missing count
- Supports the observed state.
Test another case
Add C2's confirmed count of 21. Require the one-place plan discrepancy to remain explicit rather than rewrite the plan or invent a passenger event.
Use original fictional packets. Exclude rosters, locations and safety incidents; no vehicle-departure decision is made.
Discuss a contribution
Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.