{
  "title": "Charter bus group assignment records for AI review",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/charter-bus-group-assignment-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A revised coach allocation is separate from its confirmed boarding count",
    "context": "An invented charter uses subgroup codes and artificial counts. It includes no passengers, driver, real destination, private schedule or departure clearance.",
    "records": [
      [
        "CG1",
        "Booking B plan",
        "Group total 40 practice places, original split subgroup A=20 on coach C1 and B=20 on C2."
      ],
      [
        "CG2",
        "Organizer revision",
        "Approved revision reallocates A=18 to C1 and B=22 to C2; total remains 40."
      ],
      [
        "CG3",
        "Boarding evidence",
        "C1 count explicitly confirms B/A=18. C2 has allocation only, no boarding count. Another booking B2 has a 22 count on the same date, no B link."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which boarding count is confirmed for B, and can its total or the B2 record establish that C2 boarded 22?",
    "answer": "CG2 sets B's revised allocation at 18 and 22, and CG3 independently confirms 18 boarded for subgroup A on C1. C2's 22 remains a planned allocation without boarding evidence. B2's equal count belongs to another booking and cannot fill it. Preserve the organizer's current plan and the separately observed counts rather than assume a balancing total establishes every vehicle's boarding or clears a coach for departure.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Treating revised allocation as verified boarding.",
      "Using another booking's same-date count to force the original total to balance."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Booking, subgroup and coach alias",
        "Defines the allocation."
      ],
      [
        "Revision and planned count",
        "Preserves the approved split."
      ],
      [
        "Boarding source and missing count",
        "Supports the observed state."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Add C2's confirmed count of 21. Require the one-place plan discrepancy to remain explicit rather than rewrite the plan or invent a passenger event.",
    "boundary": "Use original fictional packets. Exclude rosters, locations and safety incidents; no vehicle-departure decision is made."
  }
}