INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE
Theme park attraction document records for AI
An audit document may apply to a different attraction or version than the one in a daily summary.
NAICS 713110 · Amusement and Theme Parks
An audit document may apply to a different attraction or version than the one in a daily summary. ASTM publishes the scope of its amusement ride auditing practice. A park can test documentary matching with fictional records and no equipment use. ASTM amusement ride audit practice scope
Create two practice attractions and a dated review document for one. Add a similarly named document from another version and an unresolved note. Ask which records can be associated and where a qualified person needs to review the gap. The sample does not clear a ride, advise repairs or direct operation.
Use no actual equipment details, plans, audits, attendee records, access controls, incident history or live safety information. Use independent forms and invented labels.
Describe an attraction document exercise
Original Fiund exercise
A similarly named review may cover another attraction version
Fictional attraction aliases and original document labels create an offline scope-matching task. There are no ride components, actual audits, repairs or operating decisions.
| Record | Source | What it records |
|---|---|---|
| TP1 | Practice register | Attraction A has document version V2; attraction B has V1. |
| TP2 | Authorized review document | Explicitly names A/V2 and review scope S. It makes no statement about B. |
| TP3 | B daily-summary attachment | File title resembles A's review, but body names A/V1. A separate B note says review requested, with no result. |
Question for the model
Which attraction/version has a matching review, and what do B's attachment and request establish?
Show the reference answer and checks
TP2 matches A/V2 in TP1 for the stated review scope S. TP3's attached document names A/V1, not B/V1, so its similar title and folder location do not establish B's review. The B note records a request only. Preserve attraction, document version and scope, and flag B's missing matching result for a qualified reviewer without declaring an attraction safe, repaired or approved to operate.
- Matching review files by title while ignoring the attraction and version in the body.
- Treating a requested review as a completed audit or operating clearance.
Fields to preserve
- Attraction and version
- Defines the reviewed subject.
- Review scope and authority
- Limits what the document actually establishes.
- Request versus result state
- Makes an unresolved handoff visible.
Test another case
Add a B/V1 document limited to administrative inventory rather than scope S. Require scope matching even when attraction and version now agree.
Use invented independent forms only. Exclude equipment details, plans, real audits, attendees, access controls, incidents and live safety information.
Discuss a contribution
Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.