INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE
Structural steel weld records for AI document review
An inspection report can be valid and still belong to the wrong weld.
NAICS 332312 · Fabricated Structural Metal Manufacturing
An inspection report can be valid and still belong to the wrong weld. For a fabricated steel shop, the relevant AI task is to match a joint to the drawing, the inspection evidence, and the authorized disposition. ARM has published a welding demonstration and separate automated metallic inspection work. These examples support the technical context. A shop’s quality records require an independent data agreement. ARM welding demonstration · ARM metallic inspection project
Create two training coupons and a fictional weld map with similar joint identifiers. Give one joint a matching reviewer record and give the other a plausible-looking record tied to a prior drawing revision. Ask the assistant which evidence is missing. An evaluator should look for correct identifiers, revision history, and escalation to the authorized reviewer. The exercise ends at document routing.
Use a cold training coupon. Keep customer drawings, qualifications containing employee details, and project-specific weld procedures outside the sample. Do not infer structural integrity from images or a simulated document package.
Describe a document-routing test
Original Fiund exercise
The coupon review follows one joint only
An original paper assembly and mock coupon index model document traceability. Nothing is welded or structurally evaluated.
| Record | Source | What it records |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joint map | Assembly S7 has joints J1 and J2. |
| 2 | Coupon ledger | Coupon C4 explicitly linked to J1. |
| 3 | Review index | Review complete on C4; no coupon or review link for J2. |
Question for the model
Can J2 be marked supported by the coupon review?
Show the reference answer and checks
No. Records 2 and 3 tie the completed review to C4 and J1. Record 1 groups both joints under S7 but does not transfer the evidence to J2. Retain J2 as lacking a linked review unless a separate scope record is supplied.
- Applying one joint's review to all joints in an assembly
- Treating a review label as a real structural qualification
Fields to preserve
- joint_id
- Pins document applicability
- coupon_link
- Connects the reviewed item to its source
- review_scope
- Prevents unsupported inheritance
Test another case
Use a review explicitly listing a range of joints; verify whether J2 falls in that declared scope.
No welding procedures, technical parameters, engineering approvals or actual customer work.
Discuss a contribution
Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.