INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE
Peanut lot and inspection fraction data for AI
A farmer-stock peanut sample may be described at more than one stage.
NAICS 111992 · Peanut Farming
A farmer-stock peanut sample may be described at more than one stage. A percentage for a separated fraction is easy to attach to the wrong denominator. USDA’s farmer-stock peanut inspection instructions show a real-world workflow for tracking sample components. A grower can design a records benchmark using invented measurements and an independently written rubric. USDA farmer-stock peanut inspection instructions
Give the model a sample packet with whole pods, separated kernels, and a removed material record. State which weights refer to the original portion and which refer to a later stage. Add a result from a neighboring sample with a similar ticket number. Ask for the correct association and which denominator is relevant for a named calculation. One intentionally incomplete example should reward asking for the original weight.
Keep buyer grading and settlement reports, historic discounts, and contract information private. Use owned photo props and fictional IDs. Keep any food-safety determination outside the benchmark.
Describe the peanut sample workflow
Original Fiund exercise
A kernel fraction needs its named denominator and exact sample identity
Invented peanut sample records use practice mass units and an explicitly defined arithmetic task. They do not reproduce an official grading calculation or determine food safety.
| Record | Source | What it records |
|---|---|---|
| PF1 | Sample S1 stages | Original test portion 100 mass units. Removed material 10; remaining portion 90. Separated kernel fraction 54. |
| PF2 | Practice question definition | For this exercise only, report kernel fraction divided by the original test portion, not by the post-removal portion. |
| PF3 | Neighbor sample S11 | Kernel fraction 60, original portion missing. Ticket format resembles S1 but sample ID differs. |
Question for the model
What fraction follows for S1 under the explicit exercise definition, and can S11's fraction be computed or substituted?
Show the reference answer and checks
PF1 and PF2 define S1's calculation as 54 divided by the original 100, or 54%. Dividing by the 90-unit remainder would yield 60% but answer a different denominator question. PF3 belongs to S11 and lacks its original portion, so its defined fraction cannot be computed or substituted into S1. Preserve stage, sample identity and denominator rather than accepting a plausible-looking percentage from a nearby ticket.
- Using the post-removal mass when the task explicitly names the original portion.
- Borrowing a missing sample weight or kernel value from a similarly numbered ticket.
Fields to preserve
- Sample ID and measurement stage
- Connects each component correctly.
- Mass unit and named denominator
- Makes the arithmetic reproducible.
- Neighbor-ticket identity and missingness
- Prevents cross-sample substitution.
Test another case
Change the question to the post-removal denominator while retaining all records. Require 60% with an explicit basis rather than memorized 54%.
Use original dummy tickets and owned props. Exclude settlement reports, discounts and processor tables; the arithmetic is a fictional evaluation rule.
Discuss a contribution
Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.