{
  "title": "Peanut lot and inspection fraction data for AI",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/peanut-inspection-fractions-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A kernel fraction needs its named denominator and exact sample identity",
    "context": "Invented peanut sample records use practice mass units and an explicitly defined arithmetic task. They do not reproduce an official grading calculation or determine food safety.",
    "records": [
      [
        "PF1",
        "Sample S1 stages",
        "Original test portion 100 mass units. Removed material 10; remaining portion 90. Separated kernel fraction 54."
      ],
      [
        "PF2",
        "Practice question definition",
        "For this exercise only, report kernel fraction divided by the original test portion, not by the post-removal portion."
      ],
      [
        "PF3",
        "Neighbor sample S11",
        "Kernel fraction 60, original portion missing. Ticket format resembles S1 but sample ID differs."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "What fraction follows for S1 under the explicit exercise definition, and can S11's fraction be computed or substituted?",
    "answer": "PF1 and PF2 define S1's calculation as 54 divided by the original 100, or 54%. Dividing by the 90-unit remainder would yield 60% but answer a different denominator question. PF3 belongs to S11 and lacks its original portion, so its defined fraction cannot be computed or substituted into S1. Preserve stage, sample identity and denominator rather than accepting a plausible-looking percentage from a nearby ticket.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Using the post-removal mass when the task explicitly names the original portion.",
      "Borrowing a missing sample weight or kernel value from a similarly numbered ticket."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Sample ID and measurement stage",
        "Connects each component correctly."
      ],
      [
        "Mass unit and named denominator",
        "Makes the arithmetic reproducible."
      ],
      [
        "Neighbor-ticket identity and missingness",
        "Prevents cross-sample substitution."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Change the question to the post-removal denominator while retaining all records. Require 60% with an explicit basis rather than memorized 54%.",
    "boundary": "Use original dummy tickets and owned props. Exclude settlement reports, discounts and processor tables; the arithmetic is a fictional evaluation rule."
  }
}