INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE
Miniature golf scorecard version records for AI
A practice scorecard can use a different hole sequence after a layout change.
NAICS 713990 · All Other Amusement and Recreation Industries
A practice scorecard can use a different hole sequence after a layout change. Census includes miniature golf in this recreation group. An operator can make a fictional scorecard and compare it to an approved course revision without using any player records. Census recreation industries
Draw two original miniature course sketches and create corresponding dummy scorecards. Change one hole order and include an obsolete scorecard as a distractor. Ask which card matches each version and what evidence is missing when a label is obscured. Keep the original and derivative versions separate.
Exclude actual layouts, licensed characters, location and guest details, financial records and protected designs. Use independent sketches and dummy values.
Describe a scorecard version benchmark
Original Fiund exercise
A scorecard's hole sequence must match the named course revision
Two original abstract course sketches use geometric hole aliases. Dummy cards test version correspondence without guests, real layouts, branded characters or financial records.
| Record | Source | What it records |
|---|---|---|
| MG1 | Practice layout A | Hole order circle, triangle, square. Card CA lists that order. |
| MG2 | Approved layout B | Hole order triangle, circle, square. Card CB lists that order; A remains historical. |
| MG3 | Unclear card photo | First label cropped; visible second and third labels circle, square. No card ID or revision marker readable. |
Question for the model
Which cards explicitly match A and B, and what does the partial photograph support without a readable version identifier?
Show the reference answer and checks
MG1 explicitly matches CA to layout A, and MG2 matches CB to approved layout B. MG3's visible circle-then-square suffix agrees with B's latter sequence, but it does not identify the complete card or reveal the first label. Report that partial consistency and the missing identity evidence rather than treating an obscured card as a verified CB copy or reconstructing its hidden label as observed.
- Using a current layout to silently relabel an old card.
- Reporting a hidden first label as visibly confirmed from a plausible suffix match.
Fields to preserve
- Layout revision and ordered holes
- Defines the sequence being compared.
- Card-to-layout relation
- Keeps original and derivative records linked.
- Visible versus obscured labels
- Limits conclusions from partial images.
Test another case
Create a third card with a different first hole but the same final two labels. Test whether the model recognizes why the suffix alone was insufficient.
Use original sketches and nonvalid labels. Exclude actual venue designs, characters, locations, guest information and payment records.
Discuss a contribution
Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.