Skip to content

INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE

Dry pea and bean images for AI split-seed review

When a model sees a pale interior on a seed, it needs enough context to tell a split from a harmless lighting effect.

By Fiund · Updated 2026-11-05

NAICS 111130 · Dry Pea and Bean Farming

When a model sees a pale interior on a seed, it needs enough context to tell a split from a harmless lighting effect. USDA has distinct inspection handbooks for beans and for peas and lentils. A grower or an authorized packer can create labeled photographs that reflect the actual commodity and the specific feature an inspector checked. USDA bean inspection handbook · USDA pea and lentil handbook

Put a whole seed, an identified split, and a specimen with ambiguous glare on a plain surface. Give each an ID and capture a top and oblique view before mixing the samples. Note variety or class where authorized, lighting, and whether a trained reviewer could make a call from each view. A buyer can use crops and lighting absent from the development set to measure whether the classifier learned the feature.

Use your own seeds and photos or get permission from the seed owner and inspector. Keep supplier codes and any private grading results out of the first offer. Use your own annotations instead of copying diagrams from a third party.

Describe an image set

Original Fiund exercise

A pale patch needs an oblique view before it becomes a split label

An original pulse-inspection fixture describes owned specimen aliases and reviewer labels. No third-party diagrams, images or real grading results are supplied.

Fictional records supplied to the evaluator
RecordSourceWhat it records
DP1Bean specimen B1Top view has a pale region. Oblique view shows an intact exterior; reviewer confirms the pale region was glare.
DP2Bean specimen B2Top and oblique views show separated halves with exposed interior. Reviewer marks a confirmed split in this practice set.
DP3Lentil specimen L1Top view shows a pale region; oblique view missing and no lentil-specific review label supplied.

Question for the model

Which specimens have reviewed glare or split labels, and can L1 inherit either bean label from its pale appearance?

Show the reference answer and checks

DP1's second view and review support glare on intact B1. DP2 has an explicit split label supported by both views of B2. DP3 provides only an ambiguous top view of another commodity, so L1 remains unresolved. Do not assign the bean label from a similar pale region alone. Keep commodity, specimen identity and view sufficiency attached to each feature rather than claiming an official grade or universal visual rule.

  • Classifying every pale region as exposed interior.
  • Transferring labels between beans and lentils without the needed view or commodity-specific review.

Fields to preserve

Commodity and specimen ID
Defines the object under review.
View, lighting and feature region
Makes appearance interpretable.
Reviewer label and evidence sufficiency
Separates confirmed from unresolved cases.

Test another case

Use a different original lighting setup with B1's glare reduced. Require the intact label to follow the reviewer evidence rather than a fixed brightness threshold.

Use owned seeds and original annotations. Exclude supplier codes, private grade reports and copied handbook figures.

Download this fictional example and answer key (JSON)

Discuss a contribution

Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.

Primary sources and further reading