INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE
Dental laboratory data for AI design and model versions
FDA's medical-device printing resources provide manufacturing context.
NAICS 339116 · Dental Laboratories
FDA's medical-device printing resources provide manufacturing context. A dental laboratory can define an original task around the relationship between an approved design, a training model and the version actually produced. FDA manufacturing context
Create an original typodont-based design with fictional job identifiers, a revision register and a production record. Give the upper and lower references explicit labels. Ask which design version belongs to the recorded output. Include an approved change for a later job and a file with the same name but an earlier content identifier. The key should follow version evidence rather than filename similarity.
Annotate training model, job, reference side, design version, approval status and executed output. Hold out a new model and file-naming scheme for evaluation. Score a future change applied to an earlier output, upper and lower references confused and filename equality treated as version identity independently. Include a complete supported design-to-output chain.
Use original training models and invented records with qualified review. Actual patient material, clinician-owned designs, licensed software outputs and customer files require appropriate authority for the intended AI use. A licensing brief should state the version-review task and checked key. Confirm buyer scope before preparing commercial records or capture.
Discuss this original manufacturing sample with Fiund
Original Fiund exercise
A produced model points to the superseded design
A self-authored typodont-style paper exercise uses fictional job IDs and no patient measurements.
| Record | Source | What it records |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Revision register | Training job J4 design D1 superseded by D2 before production. |
| 2 | Production record | Mock build for J4 references D1. |
| 3 | Photo | Shows a model marked J4; no design revision visible. |
Question for the model
What should be recorded about revision conformance?
Show the reference answer and checks
Record a documented mismatch: D2 was effective for J4 under record 1, while the build references D1 in record 2. The photo in record 3 confirms only the mock job marker, not the design geometry or revision. Keep those evidence layers separate.
- Using the shared job ID as design revision proof
- Inferring an actual dental outcome from a paperwork conflict
Fields to preserve
- training_job_id
- Links revisions to the fictional item
- effective_design_revision
- Selects intended version
- build_reference
- Identifies what production recorded
Test another case
Provide a later correction to the production record without changing the physical item; keep document and model verification separate.
No patient scans, prescriptions, dental manufacturing instructions or clinical conclusions.
Discuss a contribution
Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.