Skip to content

INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE

Bulk storage inventory records for AI reconciliation

Storage capacity and recorded inventory answer different questions.

By Fiund · Updated 2026-11-05

NAICS 493190 · Other Warehousing and Storage

Storage capacity and recorded inventory answer different questions. A transfer review may need a third quantity, the amount already committed under the exercise’s records. Census distinguishes bulk storage from merchant wholesale distribution, and EPA explains bulk oil storage capacity in its program context. Use a fictional records exercise to test whether a model identifies each quantity correctly. Census NAICS manual · EPA bulk oil storage capacity context

Invent two vessel aliases, rated capacities, dated stock observations, and a proposed transfer. Give one proposed movement a later authorization and leave the other unconfirmed. Ask which values are rated, measured, or planned, and what a reviewer needs for reconciliation. Include unlike units or dates only where the expected answer flags the mismatch.

Use deliberately fictional values. Do not share real layouts, capacities, product specifications, tenant and buyer information, control systems, or facility procedures. The output is a records check, with actual operations under human control.

Describe a storage records benchmark

Original Fiund exercise

Rated capacity, measured stock and authorized movement are different quantity states

An invented storage ledger uses abstract vessels and arbitrary volume units. It contains no real capacity, product, facility layout, tenant or control-system information.

Fictional records supplied to the evaluator
RecordSourceWhat it records
BSI1Vessel A cardRated capacity 100 practice volume units. Day-2 observed stock 60 units; separately committed outbound 15, no movement confirmation.
BSI2Transfer proposalProposes moving 10 units from A to B. Later authority approves that proposal, but no measured transfer or updated stock observation supplied.
BSI3Vessel B cardCapacity 80 practice units. Stock field 40 mass units dated day 1; no density/conversion or current volume observation.

Question for the model

Which A quantities are rated, observed, committed or approved, and can B's mass be reconciled with the proposed volume transfer?

Show the reference answer and checks

BSI1 labels A's 100 as rated capacity, 60 as observed stock and 15 as committed outbound, not completed movement. BSI2 approves a ten-unit proposal without execution evidence, so A's observed 60 must not silently become 50. BSI3 mixes an earlier mass observation with a volume-based proposal and lacks a conversion basis. Report the distinct states and missing reconciliation inputs without authorizing an actual storage operation.

  • Replacing measured stock with capacity or subtracting approved but unexecuted movements as fact.
  • Combining mass and volume without a documented conversion and date basis.

Fields to preserve

Vessel and quantity type
Defines the meaning.
Observation date and unit
Supports comparison.
Commitment, approval and execution evidence
Separates planned from observed states.

Test another case

Add a verified transfer measurement and new A observation. Require the actual post-transfer state to come from those records rather than the proposal alone.

Use wholly fictional values. Exclude layouts, specifications, buyers and procedures; authorized staff retain operational control.

Download this fictional example and answer key (JSON)

Discuss a contribution

Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.

Primary sources and further reading