INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE
Air cargo piece acceptance records for AI evaluation
A cargo document can list a shipment total even though the handler has accepted only some of its pieces.
NAICS 481112 · Scheduled Freight Air Transportation
NAICS 481212 · Nonscheduled Chartered Freight Air Transportation
A cargo document can list a shipment total even though the handler has accepted only some of its pieces. TSA’s public air cargo roadmap describes industry and security responsibilities. GS1 event guidance provides a general reference for modeling custody. Use a fictional records exercise to test whether a model preserves the difference between piece receipt, shipment totals, and separate screening evidence. TSA air cargo security roadmap · GS1 EPCIS implementation guideline
Invent three package IDs under one shipment and record only two confirmed handoffs. Give one piece a second scan representing an update rather than an additional package. Ask the assistant which pieces are verified and what evidence would close the gap. Supply the relevant fields as a fictional manifest and retain the adjudicated answer separately.
Use mock documents and approved props. Do not include security procedures, screening layouts, active schedules, customer information, or real cargo descriptions. Ask carriers and contractors who controls any records jointly produced.
Describe an air cargo handoff sample
Original Fiund exercise
A shipment's three listed pieces are not three confirmed handoffs
An original air-cargo document fixture uses inert package aliases and no real cargo, carrier schedule, customer or screening process.
| Record | Source | What it records |
|---|---|---|
| ACG1 | Fictional manifest | Shipment S lists packages P1, P2 and P3, total 3 pieces. |
| ACG2 | Handler events | H1 confirms receipt of S/P1. H2 confirms S/P2. H2R explicitly updates H2's administrative label and retains P2 identity; no new piece. |
| ACG3 | Remaining evidence | P3 has planned handoff only, no receipt. No screening evidence supplied for any piece; receipt events make no screening statement. |
Question for the model
Which distinct pieces have confirmed handler receipt, and what evidence is absent for P3 and any screening claim?
Show the reference answer and checks
ACG2 confirms two distinct received pieces, P1 and P2. H2R is an update to P2's existing event rather than a third piece. ACG1's three-piece shipment total and ACG3's plan do not confirm P3 receipt. The packet also supplies no separate screening evidence, so receipt must not be described as screening completion. Report the confirmed piece set and missing records without making any air-cargo security or release decision.
- Counting an event update as another package or treating a manifest total as receipt.
- Equating handler custody with separate screening evidence.
Fields to preserve
- Shipment and piece ID
- Defines unique objects.
- Receipt event and update parent
- Prevents duplicate counting.
- Planned handoff and separate evidence type
- Preserves the missing stages.
Test another case
Add a P3 receipt under another shipment S2. Require the shipment mismatch to remain instead of closing S's piece gap.
Use original mock records and approved props. Exclude layouts, procedures and active schedules; carrier and contractor rights require separate confirmation.
Discuss a contribution
Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.