Lawsuit tracker

Warner Bros. v. Midjourney

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al. v. Midjourney, Inc. (C.D. Cal.), consolidated with No. 2:25-cv-05275

PlaintiffsWarner Bros. Entertainment, DC Comics and other Warner Bros. Discovery entities
DefendantsMidjourney, Inc.
CourtU.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Filed2025-09-04
StatusActive
Content typefilm & TV
Last updated2026-07-21
Verified against the cited sources at last update. Litigation moves fast — check the sources below for the current status.

The claims

Copyright infringement over training and over image and video outputs of Warner characters; seeks damages, disgorgement of profits and an injunction

What has happened

Warner Bros. Discovery entities, including DC Comics, sued Midjourney in Los Angeles federal court in early September 2025, becoming the third major studio group to do so. The complaint alleges Midjourney willfully generates images and videos of Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Tom and Jerry, and Scooby-Doo, and that even generic prompts like "classic comic book superhero battle" return recognizable DC characters. It also alleges Midjourney removed guardrails that had blocked infringing video generation after launching its video service. Midjourney answered with the same defenses raised in the Disney case, led by fair use, and reportedly added an unclean-hands defense. On November 4, 2025, the court consolidated the case into the Disney and Universal action, with the Disney case as lead.

Key developments

  • 2025-09-04Warner Bros. Discovery entities filed suit in C.D. Cal., alleging infringing image and video outputs of DC, Looney Tunes and Hanna-Barbera characters and the removal of video guardrails.
  • 2025-11-04The court consolidated the case with the Disney and Universal action against Midjourney, with the Disney case designated lead.

Why it matters for training data

The Warner complaint sharpened two points the earlier studio suits only gestured at: video outputs are now squarely in scope, and removing safety guardrails is being framed as evidence of willfulness, which multiplies statutory damages. Suppliers of video training data and operators of video models should assume character-level output audits will be litigation exhibits. The consolidation also shows studios coordinating rather than settling one-off, which raises the cost of an unlicensed-data strategy.

Sources

Deeper analysis

← All case files Weekly lawsuit news

Want data that clears this in diligence?

Whether you're building a model or sitting on an archive, the first conversation is short and specific.

Send a brief