INDUSTRY FIELD GUIDE
Land subdivision phase and inspection records for AI
An inspection can name a project but cover only one phase.
NAICS 237210 · Land Subdivision
An inspection can name a project but cover only one phase. If a later map divides the site, an assistant should keep the earlier observation tied to the area that was reviewed. EPA’s construction and development guidance provides context for site records. A land developer can test plan and inspection association with abstract shapes. EPA construction and development guidance
Draw a fictional phase map and revise one boundary. Attach a dated inspection note to the earlier plan and a separate follow-up to one new lot. Ask which observations are evidenced for each phase. Mark the area never reviewed and make uncertainty part of the scoring key. Use no real site layout or compliance result.
Keep survey work, addresses, commercial land records, maps, and buyer information private. Create original diagrams and approved dummy records.
Describe a subdivision evidence test
Original Fiund exercise
Preserve an inspection's original boundary when the phase map changes
Abstract paper shapes stand for fictional development phases. No real parcel, survey, compliance status or land transaction is represented.
| Record | Source | What it records |
|---|---|---|
| LP1 | Practice phase map M1 | Phase A covers cells 1–4; Phase B covers cells 5–8. |
| LP2 | Dated review I1 | Review covers Phase A under M1. Later map M2 moves cell 4 into Phase B; no retrospective scope correction is provided. |
| LP3 | Follow-up I2 | Under M2, reviewer visits cell 5 only. Cells 6–8 have no review entry. |
Question for the model
Which cells have documentary review evidence, and can either record be called a review of all Phase B under M2?
Show the reference answer and checks
LP1 and LP2 establish that I1 covered cells 1–4 as Phase A under M1. M2's later boundary change does not erase that historical coverage or make I1 a review of all current Phase B. LP3 separately covers cell 5. Cells 6–8 remain unevidenced, so neither record establishes a complete review of M2 Phase B, which spans cells 4–8.
- Reinterpreting I1 using M2 boundaries without preserving its original map reference.
- Expanding a cell-5 follow-up to all of Phase B.
Fields to preserve
- Map version and cell scope
- Retains the exact area reviewed at the time.
- Inspection date and reference map
- Prevents later boundaries from silently rewriting history.
- Unreviewed cells
- Makes incomplete phase coverage visible.
Test another case
Issue a follow-up covering cells 6–8 but exclude cell 4 explicitly. Ask the model to assemble documented coverage while preserving each review's version and exclusion.
Use original abstract diagrams. Exclude real surveys, addresses, site maps, commercial land records and buyer information. The exercise establishes no regulatory compliance.
Discuss a contribution
Describe the sources you control, the task they could support and what has already been checked. Use the existing-data assessment for an archive or the collection brief for a new recording project. The contributor agreement defines Fiund’s licensing authority and compensation. A guide or fictional exercise does not establish an accepted collection or a sale.