{
  "title": "Miscellaneous wood product data for AI part orientation",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/wood-product-grain-part-orientation-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A mirrored handle cannot pass by grain alone",
    "context": "An original handle stencil uses two offset dots and a marked face. Photos depict paper mockups.",
    "records": [
      [
        "G1",
        "Stencil",
        "With face mark up and tip pointing away, dot A lies left of center; dot B lies right."
      ],
      [
        "G2",
        "Photo",
        "Face mark up, tip away, A right and B left."
      ],
      [
        "G3",
        "Grain arrows",
        "Both stencil and mockup show grain along the length."
      ],
      [
        "G4",
        "Fixture check",
        "Image has a legible asymmetric ruler and was not mirrored."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "What aspect matches, and what does not?",
    "answer": "The lengthwise grain orientation agrees under G3. The dot geometry does not: G1 and G2 show opposite offsets under the same face and tip reference, and G4 rules out image mirroring in this exercise. The model should store both observations independently.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Accepting matched grain as proof of correct handedness",
      "Using screen-left without a face and tip reference"
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "face_and_tip",
        "Fixes object orientation"
      ],
      [
        "dot_lateral_offset",
        "Records handed geometry independently of grain"
      ],
      [
        "image_mirror_status",
        "Distinguishes camera effects from part orientation"
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Supply a mirrored copy with the ruler reversed and require the reviewer to correct the view before comparing dots.",
    "boundary": "The mockup contains no commercial drawings, jigs or claims about strength."
  }
}