{
  "title": "Tribal government data use and authorization records for AI",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/tribal-government-data-use-authority-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "Different proposed uses require their own documented authority",
    "context": "This independently authored abstract governance exercise does not describe any actual Tribal Nation or its approval process. It uses original generic office material, with separate fictional approvals for review and evaluation.",
    "records": [
      [
        "TG1",
        "Proposed-use register",
        "Original mock material M requested for private review R, detached evaluation E and model training T. Uses explicitly distinct."
      ],
      [
        "TG2",
        "Fictional approval A-R",
        "Allows private review R by named practice role, days 1–10; does not authorize E or T."
      ],
      [
        "TG3",
        "Fictional approval A-E",
        "Allows detached evaluation E on a de-identified practice copy during days 5–8. Training T has no approval record."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which requested uses are documented on day 6, and can either approval or generic possession of M establish training authority?",
    "answer": "TG2 supports the specified private review R on day 6, and TG3 separately supports detached evaluation E on its named practice copy within days 5–8. Neither record approves T, so training remains unapproved in this fictional register. Preserve use, copy, recipient and term rather than extending a limited review or evaluation permission to training. Actual Tribal data proposals must follow the relevant Nation's own governance and documented terms.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Treating private review access as permission for any downstream model use.",
      "Applying an evaluation-copy approval to a different copy, recipient or training purpose."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Proposed purpose",
        "Distinguishes review, evaluation and training."
      ],
      [
        "Copy and recipient scope",
        "Limits the authority to its stated material and role."
      ],
      [
        "Approval term and source",
        "Makes date-specific authorization inspectable."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Ask about day 9, after A-E's term ends but A-R remains in term. Require separate date-specific findings without inferring a renewed approval.",
    "boundary": "Use independent generic materials only. Exclude cultural knowledge, language recordings, enrollment, lands and sensitive community records. No fictional rule substitutes for a Nation's actual authority."
  }
}