{
  "title": "Softwood plywood data for AI stamp and cut-plan review",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/softwood-panel-stamp-cut-plan-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "Which child keeps the original mark?",
    "context": "A self-drawn panel bears a fictional circular locator. A cut diagram tracks the original marking after subdivision.",
    "records": [
      [
        "S1",
        "Parent image",
        "Panel P1 locator centered at x=85; circle extends from x=81 to x=89."
      ],
      [
        "S2",
        "Cut plan",
        "Child A covers x<80; B covers x≥80 in the mock map."
      ],
      [
        "S3",
        "Inventory",
        "Both A and B carry the parent ID in their record."
      ],
      [
        "S4",
        "Prompt",
        "Identify the child carrying the intact physical locator."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Where should the visible mark be expected?",
    "answer": "Expect the intact locator on child B. Its full 81 to 89 extent in S1 lies in B's interval under S2. S3 gives both children lineage to P1, but a shared parent record is not evidence that A bears the physical mark.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Copying a physical mark to all children in the ledger",
      "Using only a mark center when a cut could split its shape"
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "mark_extent",
        "Lets the model distinguish intact and split marks"
      ],
      [
        "cut_interval",
        "Maps parent coordinates to children"
      ],
      [
        "lineage_id",
        "Keeps provenance separate from physical marking"
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Move the cut to x=85 and label two partial marks with neither child carrying the intact shape.",
    "boundary": "The locator is invented; exclude genuine grade stamps, building approvals and actual mill records."
  }
}