{
  "title": "Social science codebooks and annotation revision data for AI",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/social-research-codebook-change-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A split theme requires the codebook version and an adjudication trail",
    "context": "Two independently written sentences describe imaginary commuting preferences. They are authored examples, not human-subject responses or a representation of an actual study.",
    "records": [
      [
        "SC1",
        "Codebook versions",
        "Version 1 code ACCESS covers both fare and route availability. Version 2 replaces it with COST and ROUTE; ambiguous text may remain UNRESOLVED."
      ],
      [
        "SC2",
        "Fictional excerpts",
        "Excerpt A: 'The fare exceeds my daily budget.' Excerpt B: 'Getting there is difficult.' Both received ACCESS in round 1."
      ],
      [
        "SC3",
        "Round 2 adjudication",
        "A assigned COST under v2 because it explicitly mentions fare. B has no completed adjudication and no stated reason for its difficulty."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which v2 label is supported for A, and can B's old ACCESS label be automatically converted to COST or ROUTE?",
    "answer": "SC3 supports COST for A under version 2, with the explicit fare wording in SC2 as the reason. B's version-1 ACCESS annotation spans both new themes and its sentence does not disambiguate them. Preserve B's historical ACCESS label with version 1 and mark its v2 assignment unresolved. Neither inheritance from the old label nor assumptions about commuting difficulty supply the missing adjudication.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Displaying ACCESS as if it retained the same definition after the version-2 split.",
      "Guessing an ambiguous excerpt's cause from a general commuting stereotype."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Excerpt and annotation round",
        "Preserves the text linked to each decision."
      ],
      [
        "Codebook version and definition",
        "Makes the label interpretable."
      ],
      [
        "Adjudicator reason and unresolved state",
        "Distinguishes reviewed assignments from inferred ones."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Change B to 'There is no bus route to that stop' and supply a new v2 adjudication. Require an updated ROUTE label with the new evidence, without rewriting round-1 history.",
    "boundary": "Use original fictional excerpts. Real participant data, consent scope and later AI reuse require separate authorization and review."
  }
}