{
  "title": "Sign manufacturing data for AI artwork and cutline revisions",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/sign-artwork-cutline-revision-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "The artwork was updated but its cutline was not",
    "context": "An original paper sign has owned artwork and a separate mock cutline layer.",
    "records": [
      [
        "1",
        "Proof rev A",
        "Square art, cutline L1."
      ],
      [
        "2",
        "Approved mock rev B",
        "Circle art, cutline L2."
      ],
      [
        "3",
        "Fabrication packet",
        "Job references rev B; circle art included with L1 cutline."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which layer is out of date?",
    "answer": "The circle artwork agrees with rev B, but L1 is the cutline from rev A. Records 1–3 support a cutline-version discrepancy even though the job reference and visible art are current. Compare each production layer to the corresponding proof field.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Using a current proof title to validate every layer",
      "Treating art and fabrication cutline as the same object"
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "proof_revision",
        "Defines expected layer versions"
      ],
      [
        "artwork_id",
        "Checks visual content independently"
      ],
      [
        "cutline_id",
        "Tracks the fabricated outline reference"
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Use a revision that changes only artwork and explicitly retains its cutline; avoid flagging an unchanged valid layer.",
    "boundary": "Use owned artwork; no client marks, production settings, municipal signage or compliance claims."
  }
}