{
  "title": "Residential disability support preference records for AI",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/residential-disability-preference-review-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A staff suggestion does not replace an adult's stated preference",
    "context": "An independently authored fictional exchange concerns two activity times. It contains no resident, disability detail, voice, image or actual support-plan decision.",
    "records": [
      [
        "PPD1",
        "Adult's original statement",
        "Fictional adult says, 'I prefer the afternoon activity.' Speaker role clearly marked PERSON."
      ],
      [
        "PPD2",
        "Staff suggestion",
        "Role STAFF suggests morning might fit the practice schedule. No person acceptance or change of preference recorded."
      ],
      [
        "PPD3",
        "Later review note",
        "Administrative note says 'discussed timing; decision pending.' It does not attribute a new choice to the person or confirm a plan."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which preference is evidenced, and who still needs to confirm any final timing arrangement?",
    "answer": "PPD1 directly supports the fictional adult's afternoon preference. PPD2 is a staff suggestion, not the person's revised choice. PPD3 leaves a decision pending and supplies no acceptance that supersedes the stated preference. Preserve speaker attribution and the unresolved plan status; confirmation belongs with the person and authorized team. This exercise evaluates documentation of agency, without choosing a support plan or determining a person's needs.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Rewriting a staff scheduling suggestion as the person's preference.",
      "Treating a discussion note as a finalized plan or inferring acceptance from silence."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Statement and speaker role",
        "Preserves whose view is recorded."
      ],
      [
        "Preference versus suggestion",
        "Distinguishes source authority."
      ],
      [
        "Decision state and explicit acceptance",
        "Limits claims of agreement."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Add a later PERSON statement explicitly choosing morning. Require the preference to update through that source, retaining the earlier afternoon history.",
    "boundary": "Use original fictional adult text only. Exclude resident records and disability information; support planning stays with the person and authorized team."
  }
}