{
  "title": "Reforestation planting and survival records for AI review",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/reforestation-planting-survival-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "Completed planting counts and later sample observations answer different questions",
    "context": "An imaginary planting project has abstract plots and original visit cards. No sensitive species, project coordinates, actual contract or site certification is represented.",
    "records": [
      [
        "RP1",
        "Plan and completion",
        "Plot A planned 100 seedlings, documented planted 90. Plot B planned 100, documented planted 100."
      ],
      [
        "RP2",
        "Later sample visit",
        "A's defined ten-position sample: 8 observed alive, 1 observed not alive, 1 position not assessed because view inaccessible. No extrapolation method supplied."
      ],
      [
        "RP3",
        "Plot B follow-up",
        "Scheduled visit only, no completed observation record. Dashboard draft writes B survival=0."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "What planting and sampled follow-up facts are supported, and what cannot be concluded about overall survival?",
    "answer": "RP1 supports 90 planted in A and 100 in B, separately from their plans. RP2 records eight alive and one not alive among nine assessed sample positions, with one unassessed; it does not establish a whole-plot survival rate without a defined sampling and estimation basis. RP3 provides no B follow-up observation, so zero is unsupported. Keep planned, installed, assessed and missing counts distinct rather than equating planting completion with later survival.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Treating planted seedlings as confirmed surviving seedlings.",
      "Coding missing follow-up as zero or extrapolating a partial sample without its design."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Plot and planting record type",
        "Separates planned and completed work."
      ],
      [
        "Sample coverage and assessment state",
        "Defines the observed denominator."
      ],
      [
        "Visit completion and estimation basis",
        "Limits broader outcome claims."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Supply B's completed sample visit with an explicit coverage map. Require a sample-specific result while retaining the distinction from a whole-site certification.",
    "boundary": "Use fictional maps and records. Exclude locations, access details, contract prices and protected resources; qualified reviewers retain site judgments."
  }
}