{
  "title": "Public legal office statement and publication records for AI",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/public-prosecution-statement-version-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A date-only correction does not authorize a proposed new sentence",
    "context": "An invented government legal office announces a generic archive-opening date. Original statements contain no real case, investigation, witness, privileged communication or legal strategy.",
    "records": [
      [
        "PSV1",
        "Authorized statement V1",
        "Administrative archive opens day 12. Text approved for the practice public summary."
      ],
      [
        "PSV2",
        "Authorized correction V2",
        "Changes opening date to day 14 only; all other approved wording unchanged."
      ],
      [
        "PSV3",
        "Proposed summary",
        "Uses day 14 and adds all historical files will be available, a sentence absent from V1/V2 and lacking approval."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "What opening date and wording are supported for the current practice summary, and does the corrected date authorize the added availability claim?",
    "answer": "PSV2 supports day 14 and retains the otherwise approved V1 wording. PSV3 correctly uses that date but adds an availability claim with no source or approval in the packet. A valid correction to one field does not authorize new substantive language elsewhere. Quote or summarize only the supported current statement and flag the added sentence for the office's authorized review rather than treating the entire draft as cleared.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Approving a whole summary because one corrected date matches.",
      "Treating a proposed new sentence as part of a narrow authorized correction."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Statement version and release authority",
        "Identifies the public source."
      ],
      [
        "Correction target",
        "Makes the date-only scope explicit."
      ],
      [
        "Draft-added claim and supporting citation",
        "Exposes unsupported new wording."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Approve a different new sentence about a reading-room schedule while leaving file availability unaddressed. Require sentence-level source matching rather than a blanket approval.",
    "boundary": "Use original fictional announcements. Exclude actual cases, investigative material, witnesses, privileged communications and legal strategy."
  }
}