{
  "title": "Residential property maintenance work orders for AI triage",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/property-maintenance-work-order-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "Two damp-wall reports can have different evidence and handoffs",
    "context": "A fictional vacant training unit produces independent ticket and reviewer records. The exercise follows a stated practice policy without diagnosing a real building or evaluating a resident.",
    "records": [
      [
        "MW1",
        "Ticket A and qualified finding",
        "Mock message reports damp wall. Reviewer documents a condensation finding under exercise policy P; follow-up review records the practice outcome."
      ],
      [
        "MW2",
        "Ticket B",
        "Same short complaint. Photo shows a damp-looking patch but no source observation or qualified finding."
      ],
      [
        "MW3",
        "Practice policy P",
        "Route documented findings to their named follow-up path; unresolved source goes to qualified inspection. No rule permits copying A's finding to B."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which ticket has a supported finding-to-outcome chain, and how should B's similar complaint be routed under the supplied policy?",
    "answer": "MW1 supports Ticket A's recorded finding and follow-up outcome within the fictional policy. MW2 supplies a similar complaint and appearance but lacks evidence establishing its source. Under MW3, B should remain an unresolved-source case routed to qualified inspection. Do not copy A's condensation finding, infer an active leak from appearance alone or label either complainant's reliability. The useful target is the evidenced work-order handoff.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Applying one ticket's diagnosis to a similar complaint without its own finding.",
      "Replacing an evidence gap with a resident-reliability judgment or an unverified technical cause."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Ticket-to-finding relationship",
        "Keeps the diagnosis evidence attached to its own case."
      ],
      [
        "Qualified review and observed outcome",
        "Preserves who checked the finding and follow-up."
      ],
      [
        "Policy version and handoff",
        "Defines how an unresolved case is routed."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Give B a qualified finding different from A's and retain the same complaint wording. Score whether the model follows the new evidence rather than the recurring text.",
    "boundary": "Use fabricated tickets and approved vacant training props. Exclude residents, unit IDs, leases, access codes, personal belongings and identity documents."
  }
}