{
  "title": "Podiatry site diagram and follow-up linkage data for AI",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/podiatry-site-followup-map-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A numbered region needs side and encounter before a follow-up can be matched",
    "context": "Two original generic foot outlines use numbered abstract regions. They contain no clinical photographs, real observations, patient information or treatment instructions.",
    "records": [
      [
        "PD1",
        "Diagram map",
        "Encounter E1: LEFT region 2 marked A; RIGHT region 2 marked B. Distinct original diagram references DL and DR."
      ],
      [
        "PD2",
        "Mock follow-up F1",
        "Explicitly names E1/LEFT/region 2 and diagram DL. Administrative label REVIEWED, no medical finding."
      ],
      [
        "PD3",
        "Conflicting F2",
        "Header says E1/RIGHT/region 2; attached diagram label says LEFT/region 2. No reviewed reconciliation; another E2 diagram also uses region 2."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which annotation matches F1, and how should F2's side conflict and the E2 diagram be handled?",
    "answer": "PD1 and PD2 match F1 to E1's LEFT region two, annotation A on DL. PD3 conflicts between RIGHT in its header and LEFT on the attached diagram, so it needs source reconciliation rather than a forced match. E2's repeated region number belongs to another encounter and cannot resolve it. Preserve side, encounter and region together without interpreting a clinical condition from the invented labels.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Matching region number while ignoring laterality or encounter.",
      "Choosing one conflicting side label without authorized evidence."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Encounter and diagram ID",
        "Defines the source."
      ],
      [
        "Side and numbered region",
        "Disambiguates repeated local labels."
      ],
      [
        "Follow-up target and conflict status",
        "Supports the exact association."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Add a reviewed correction changing F2's header to LEFT but referencing E2. Require the remaining encounter mismatch to stay open.",
    "boundary": "Use independently drawn outlines and qualified review of the fictional key. Exclude real images, charts and patient identifiers."
  }
}