{
  "title": "Pension plan amendment records for AI review",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/pension-plan-amendment-evidence-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "Amendment issuance and effectiveness select different review dates",
    "context": "A fictional retirement-plan packet has original version cards and an invented service timeline. It includes no participant, salary, beneficiary or actual benefit calculation.",
    "records": [
      [
        "PA1",
        "Practice plan version rule",
        "Version A applies before day 30. Amendment B issued day 10, effective day 30, explicitly replaces A for requests dated day 30 onward."
      ],
      [
        "PA2",
        "Request cards",
        "Request R1 dated day 20; request R2 dated day 35. Both concern the same invented plan, with no outcome decision supplied."
      ],
      [
        "PA3",
        "Service extract",
        "Service rows supplied for periods 1 and 3; period 2 marked missing source, not zero service. No approved gap resolution."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which practice version should the reviewer consult for R1 and R2, and is the service evidence complete?",
    "answer": "PA1's explicit exercise rule selects A for PA2's day-20 R1, even though amendment B had already been issued. It selects B for day-35 R2 after B's effective date. PA3 leaves period 2 unsupported; a missing source is not a verified zero and prevents a complete service-history statement. Identify the proper version and evidence gap without calculating, interpreting or awarding a benefit.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Applying an amendment from its issuance date despite a later effective date.",
      "Converting missing service evidence into a zero-valued history entry."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Request date and plan identity",
        "Anchors the version selection."
      ],
      [
        "Issue date, effective date and stated transition",
        "Defines the fixture's rule."
      ],
      [
        "Service period and source completeness",
        "Preserves the unresolved history."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Supply a reviewed period-2 card explicitly showing zero under the fictional rubric. Require the missingness finding to change only because new evidence is present.",
    "boundary": "Use original mock plan records. Exclude actual participant files and confidential advice; plan staff retain interpretation and benefit decisions."
  }
}