{
  "title": "Municipal plan-review examples for evaluating AI document intake",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/municipal-plan-review-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "The right application type determines which intake item is missing",
    "context": "A fictional municipality has an independently authored intake checklist and abstract drawings. It illustrates document completeness, not a permit or compliance decision for any actual property.",
    "records": [
      [
        "MI1",
        "Practice checklist revision C2",
        "Type A requires form F and diagram D. Type B requires F, D and owner-authority card O. C2 replaces C1 from day 10."
      ],
      [
        "MI2",
        "Mock application X",
        "Type B received day 12; contains F and D, with O absent."
      ],
      [
        "MI3",
        "Comparator and old checklist",
        "Application Y is Type A with F and D. Older C1 omitted O for Type B; no exception authorizes C1 for X."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which intake evidence is missing for X under the dated checklist, and why does Y's packet or old C1 not establish X's completeness?",
    "answer": "MI1 makes C2 applicable after day 10, and MI2 places X on day 12 as Type B. X therefore lacks owner-authority card O under the exercise checklist. Y's F-and-D packet addresses Type A, which has a different requirement, while superseded C1 supplies no exception for X. Identify the missing item and route to a human intake reviewer without approving compliance, issuing a permit or inferring rights to real applicant materials.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Applying Type A completeness requirements to a Type B application.",
      "Using an obsolete checklist because it yields a complete result."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Application type and received date",
        "Selects the relevant practice requirements."
      ],
      [
        "Checklist revision and item list",
        "Makes the missing evidence precise."
      ],
      [
        "Present, absent and exception states",
        "Preserves the human-review handoff."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Provide O but omit D in a new Type B case. Require a fresh item-by-item check instead of memorizing O as every application's missing document.",
    "boundary": "Use fabricated intake records and independent diagrams. Exclude addresses, applicants, security-sensitive plans and actual permit decisions."
  }
}