{
  "title": "Human rights organization evidence classification for AI",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/human-rights-evidence-classification-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A corroborated time does not establish the motive behind a reported concern",
    "context": "An original scenario describes denied access to a fictional public meeting. It contains no real survivor, witness, activist, organization or casework.",
    "records": [
      [
        "HR1",
        "Invented concern report",
        "Alias A says entry was denied at 10:05 and alleges motive M. No independent motive evidence supplied."
      ],
      [
        "HR2",
        "Original corroborating log",
        "Confirms the mock entry desk closed at 10:00. It neither identifies A nor states a motive."
      ],
      [
        "HR3",
        "Approved practice wording",
        "Publication reviewer permits the statement: a reported denial occurred after the logged closing time; motive remains unverified. No broader allegation cleared."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which timing claim has corroborating context, and what would overstate the identity, motive or approved publication evidence?",
    "answer": "HR2 corroborates the desk's recorded 10:00 closing time, which is consistent with HR1's reported later 10:05 denial but does not independently identify A or prove motive M. HR3 supplies narrowly approved wording that retains those limits. Distinguish a report, corroborating context and verified motive rather than presenting the allegation as established or expanding the approved statement beyond its source.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Treating evidence of closing time as proof of an alleged motive.",
      "Converting a reported concern or approved cautious summary into an independently verified identity claim."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Claim and source type",
        "Separates allegation from corroborating context."
      ],
      [
        "Time and identity coverage",
        "Shows exactly what the log establishes."
      ],
      [
        "Approved wording and uncertainty",
        "Preserves publication limits without inventing motive."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Add a contradictory timing record with uncertain origin. Require the model to surface the conflict and provenance gap rather than resolve it from narrative preference.",
    "boundary": "Use invented original text only. Exclude actual interviews, survivors, witnesses, activists and sensitive case information."
  }
}