{
  "title": "Foundation grant milestone and report records for AI",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/foundation-grant-milestone-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A timely report receipt is not milestone acceptance",
    "context": "A fabricated award has two administrative milestones and an authorized deadline amendment. No real grantee, beneficiary, grant amount or funding recommendation appears.",
    "records": [
      [
        "FG1",
        "Practice award",
        "Milestone M1 report due day 10; M2 report due day 20."
      ],
      [
        "FG2",
        "Authorized amendment and receipt",
        "M2 deadline moves to day 25. M2 report received day 24; receipt confirms upload only."
      ],
      [
        "FG3",
        "Review record",
        "Reviewer accepts M1. No M2 acceptance, outcome verification or additional amendment supplied."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which receipt is within its amended deadline, and does the M1 approval or M2 upload establish M2 acceptance?",
    "answer": "FG2 places M2's day-24 receipt before its amended day-25 deadline, supporting timely receipt under the fictional record. FG3 accepts M1 only and does not establish M2 acceptance or outcome verification. Keep amended due date, received document and reviewer disposition as separate fields rather than calling a timely upload an accepted milestone or borrowing another milestone's approval.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Using M2's superseded day-20 deadline after an explicit amendment.",
      "Treating upload receipt or M1's review as approval of M2."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Award and milestone identity",
        "Defines the review target."
      ],
      [
        "Original and amended deadline",
        "Makes timeliness reproducible."
      ],
      [
        "Receipt versus acceptance source",
        "Separates delivery evidence from substantive review."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Add M2 acceptance that requests a corrected attachment. Require a precise qualified disposition rather than an unconditional complete badge.",
    "boundary": "Use original synthetic paperwork. Exclude grantees, beneficiaries, evaluations and unpublished amounts, and make no allocation or funding recommendation."
  }
}