{
  "title": "Forging stage and surface data for AI inspection",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/forging-stage-inspection-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A stage-specific border changes the label",
    "context": "Inert paper mockups have a fictional border tab and original inspection images.",
    "records": [
      [
        "1",
        "Stage rubric",
        "Border tab expected on intermediate I; final F reference omits it."
      ],
      [
        "2",
        "Image A",
        "Piece P4 at I with visible border tab."
      ],
      [
        "3",
        "Image B",
        "Same piece at F with tab still visible in the same region."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "How should the tab annotation change between images?",
    "answer": "At I the tab agrees with the intermediate reference, using records 1 and 2. At F the same visible feature differs from the final reference in records 1 and 3. Store the appearance and stage separately; do not assign the same discrepancy label to both.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Flagging intermediate geometry using the final template",
      "Assuming every image of one piece has the same stage label"
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "inspection_stage",
        "Selects applicable reference"
      ],
      [
        "border_region",
        "Locates the visible feature"
      ],
      [
        "reference_expectation",
        "Distinguishes expected shape from discrepancy"
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Hide the stage code and use an ambiguous border shape; retain the feature but withhold conformity labeling.",
    "boundary": "No actual forging recipes, tooling, thresholds or release decisions."
  }
}