{
  "title": "Cacao manufacturing data for AI roast-to-grind lineage",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/cacao-roast-grind-lot-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A recent receiving lot cannot replace all documented ancestors of a blended output",
    "context": "An original fictional lot graph uses abstract origins and batch names. There is no cacao, formula, roast setting, supplier contract or actual origin claim.",
    "records": [
      [
        "CLG1",
        "Receiving and split",
        "Origin alias O1 lot B1 splits into mock roast outputs R1 and R2. Distinct O2 lot B2 is the documented source of earlier ground lot G0."
      ],
      [
        "CLG2",
        "Actual lineage",
        "Finished lot F1 uses R1 plus G0 under an exact original merge record. F2 uses R2 only. Neither record supplies proportional contribution."
      ],
      [
        "CLG3",
        "Packaging proof",
        "Draft for F1 names only O1 because B1 is most recent. No approved rule for discarding a documented ancestor."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which origins are supported for F1 and F2, and what information does the graph not establish?",
    "answer": "CLG1 and CLG2 trace F1 through R1 to B1/O1 and through G0 to B2/O2. F2 traces only through R2 to B1/O1 in the supplied graph. CLG3 omits a documented F1 ancestor and cannot override the actual merge. Neither lineage proves relative percentages because quantities are absent. Preserve every supported ancestor and leave composition proportions unresolved rather than treat the most recent receipt as the only source.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Dropping a carryover ancestor when following a split and merge.",
      "Inferring source percentages from the number or recency of ancestor records."
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "Receiving lot and fictional origin",
        "Defines ancestry."
      ],
      [
        "Split, merge and output links",
        "Supports graph traversal."
      ],
      [
        "Quantity basis and proof discrepancy",
        "Limits composition claims."
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Reverse the receiving order and use a single-source F3 without a merge. Require the source set to follow the graph rather than assume every final lot has two origins.",
    "boundary": "Use original fictitious data. Exclude real sourcing and production settings; qualified staff retain actual label and product decisions."
  }
}