{
  "title": "Architectural metal data for AI pattern and panel identity",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/architectural-metal-pattern-panel-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "A continuous pattern meets two panel edges",
    "context": "An owned geometric paper mural is divided into numbered panels with edge marks.",
    "records": [
      [
        "1",
        "Elevation sketch",
        "P2 east must meet P3 west; diagonal line should cross at marker 4."
      ],
      [
        "2",
        "Assembly photo",
        "P2 east and P3 west abut; line reaches marker 4 on P2 and marker 2 on P3."
      ],
      [
        "3",
        "Component sheet",
        "P3 shown with an upside-down corner marker relative to the sketch."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which observations should the reviewer keep?",
    "answer": "Records 1 and 2 confirm the correct panel pair and edge pairing but show a discontinuity at markers 4 and 2. Record 3 separately supports a P3 orientation discrepancy. Keep both observations; the case does not establish that rotation alone fully explains the mismatch.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Using panel adjacency as proof of pattern continuity",
      "Converting a marker difference directly into a manufacturing cause"
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "panel_edge_pair",
        "Defines adjacent edges"
      ],
      [
        "crossing_marker",
        "Measures visible pattern continuity"
      ],
      [
        "corner_orientation",
        "Tracks rotation independently"
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Use a correctly oriented P3 with a different marker offset to separate alignment from part rotation.",
    "boundary": "Original paper art only; exclude customer elevations, actual building dimensions and engineering judgments."
  }
}