{
  "title": "Apparel accessory data for AI size and component matching",
  "source_page": "https://fiund.com/industries/apparel-accessory-size-component-data",
  "authorship": "Original fictional Fiund editorial exercise. No actual operating records or third-party source assets are included.",
  "example": {
    "title": "Short shell, long fastener",
    "context": "A fictional fabric wristband has an owned paper pattern. A separate lining is common to two styles, while fastener lengths differ.",
    "records": [
      [
        "A1",
        "Assembly card",
        "Small uses shell S and fastener F1; large uses shell L and F2. Both use lining L0."
      ],
      [
        "A2",
        "Bench photo",
        "Tag on the shell reads S; the lining is tagged L0."
      ],
      [
        "A3",
        "Fastener envelope",
        "The opened envelope is marked F2."
      ],
      [
        "A4",
        "Count sheet",
        "No second fastener envelope at this station."
      ]
    ],
    "question": "Which component is mismatched for the small wristband?",
    "answer": "The F2 fastener in A3 is the mismatch. A1 calls for F1 on the small shell shown in A2. L0 is common to both sizes, so its presence does not imply a large variant. No substitute fastener is documented in A4.",
    "failureModes": [
      "Using the lining tag as a size signal",
      "Treating a fastener-envelope label as proof of the physical contents without inspection"
    ],
    "fields": [
      [
        "shell_variant",
        "Sets the size-dependent parts list"
      ],
      [
        "common_component",
        "Flags parts shared by more than one size"
      ],
      [
        "evidence_grain",
        "Distinguishes envelope label from item marking"
      ]
    ],
    "holdout": "Add an F2 envelope containing an individually marked F1. Ask the reviewer to retain the packaging conflict and identify the observed part.",
    "boundary": "No real apparel patterns, brand marks, body measurements or customer size data."
  }
}